Collocations for Collaborative Work, Clear Decisions and Responsible Leadership
LISTEN • PRIORITISE • COLLABORATE • DELIVER
Start the lesson
Effective teams combine clear objectives with trust, constructive feedback and shared responsibility. Strong leadership creates direction while giving people room to contribute.
Good leadership is not about having every answer. It is about setting priorities, inviting useful feedback and helping people take responsibility together.
Explore the readingLexiLink · Leadership, Teamwork and Decision-Making B2–C1 80 minutes
Complete the tasks and test leadership-related collocations in SkELL. Then describe how a team could make one decision more fairly and effectively.
Teacher-facing timing plan. The sequence moves from lexical noticing and IELTS-style reading to contextual practice, SkELL verification and productive use.
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to use B2+–C1 collocations for leadership, teamwork and decision-making, distinguish close meanings, test language hypotheses with SkELL, and use expressions accurately in context.
Study each expression, its meaning and the synonyms that may fit a similar context. Compare the alternatives carefully: words may be close in meaning without being interchangeable in every sentence.
Read the text carefully or listen to it. Target collocations are shown in bold. The case study and its figures are fictional and created for learning purposes.
Pause / Resume preserves your place, or move the slider to jump to another part of the text.
A. On 7 February 2024, the fictional company Northline Services began a six-month team-development project after a staff survey found that 41% of employees were unclear about project priorities. Team director Helen Brooks introduced clear objectives and asked managers to set priorities at the beginning of each week. She explained that leadership should create direction without preventing staff from contributing ideas.
B. Project manager Amir Patel began to delegate tasks according to colleagues’ strengths. The team agreed to keep shared responsibility for the final outcome, even when individual tasks were assigned to different people. A short performance review on 20 April showed that completed weekly tasks had risen from 68% to 82%, although the team noted that the project had also become less complex during that period.
C. Disagreement emerged when a deadline was brought forward. Rather than avoiding the issue, Brooks encouraged colleagues to resolve conflict through a structured decision-making process. Team members compared risks, discussed resource limits and worked to build consensus on a revised schedule. The final agreement was recorded with specific accountability measures so that every person knew which actions they owned.
D. An internal review dated 12 June 2024 found that staff valued constructive feedback but wanted more time for coaching. Human-resources adviser Lina Mensah recommended training managers to motivate staff without relying only on targets. She also suggested that leaders recognise collective effort and encourage employees to take initiative when they notice a problem.
E. The project report published on 9 August 2024 recommended continued strategic planning, realistic ways to manage workload and stronger team cohesion. It noted that a trust-based relationship helped people share concerns early, while effective crisis management depended on calm communication. The report did not claim that one leadership style was best for every situation; it advised managers to adjust their approach to the team and the task.
Decide whether each statement agrees with the passage. Choose TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN.
Match each statement to paragraph A–E. Use each paragraph once.
Choose the best answer according to the passage.
Complete each expression using its meaning and the context; choose the word that makes a natural collocation.
Choose the missing word in each collocation. Read the whole expression, not just the blank.
Use sentence meaning and grammar to select a collocation that fits the context.
Choose the collocation that best fits the situation about leadership, teamwork and decision-making, cultural identity or cooperation. Use the contextual meaning to decide; do not classify parts of speech.
Choose the expression that fits the situation and the meaning of the sentence.
Open SkELL. Search constructive feedback, shared responsibility, strategic planning and team cohesion in Word Sketch. Compare authentic examples and meanings. Record two collocations, write an original sentence for each, add related expressions and explain how corpus evidence confirmed or changed your first hypothesis.
Three options in each question express similar meanings. Choose the one collocation that does NOT belong to the synonym group. All options are natural expressions; the odd one out is different in meaning.
Choose the collocation that matches the meaning described. All options are natural English expressions; use meaning rather than parts of speech.
These tests become progressively harder: recognise collocations, choose expressions in context, compare close meanings, and evaluate realistic situations involving leadership, teamwork and decision-making. The practice score is reported separately from the 115-point lesson total.
Write at least 100 words about a team facing a difficult decision. Use at least eight target collocations and explain how the leader can involve team members. The 100-word target is recommended for full writing credit, but unfinished work can still be submitted.
Please compose your paragraph here rather than pasting a prepared text. Normal paste, cut/copy shortcuts and drag-and-drop are blocked in this writing field. This browser restriction supports the task rules but is not a complete plagiarism-detection system.
0 words — 100-word minimum to submit; no maximum
Use the word counter below to review your draft. You may submit unfinished work for teacher feedback.
Your name and group from the student profile above, your SkELL collocations and original sentences, related words, corpus notes, writing paragraph and available exercise scores will be collected in the teacher's spreadsheet.
Auto-scored sections: reading MCQ, True/False, paragraph matching, Matching, Sentence Completion, Odd One Out, Find the Collocate, Multiple Choice, Lexical Cloze and Collocation Repair (100 points total). SkELL cluster (10) and productive writing (5) are teacher-scored. Maximum lesson total: 115 points. The 24-point Progressive Lexical Test is submitted as a separate practice result and is not added to the lesson total.
Vocabulary bank informed by the Lesson 25 topic, “Leadership, Teamwork and Decision-Making,” in the supplied LexiLink lesson collection. Definitions, reading and interactive exercises were adapted or written for LexiLink.
LexiLink · Connect words. Build fluency. Lesson submissions are sent to the configured Google Apps Script collector. The teacher must verify the saved row in Google Sheets because the browser cannot read confirmation in no-cors mode.